Comments on: Edgy on Rails? Get compiling! http://mandhro.com/2007/01/11/edgy-on-rails-get-compiling/ technology = evolution; open source = punctuated equilibrium Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:05:36 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Zak Mandhro http://mandhro.com/2007/01/11/edgy-on-rails-get-compiling/comment-page-1/#comment-955 Zak Mandhro Mon, 21 May 2007 03:46:38 +0000 http://mandhro.com/2007/01/11/edgy-on-rails-get-compiling/#comment-955 Adam: Yep, thanks. Fixed. - Zak Adam:

Yep, thanks. Fixed.

- Zak

]]> By: adam http://mandhro.com/2007/01/11/edgy-on-rails-get-compiling/comment-page-1/#comment-949 adam Sat, 19 May 2007 22:45:18 +0000 http://mandhro.com/2007/01/11/edgy-on-rails-get-compiling/#comment-949 There's a typo in the code section under Pound; you left the apt-get command "install" out of the instruction. Thanks for this post! There’s a typo in the code section under Pound; you left the apt-get command “install” out of the instruction. Thanks for this post!

]]> By: Zak Mandhro http://mandhro.com/2007/01/11/edgy-on-rails-get-compiling/comment-page-1/#comment-641 Zak Mandhro Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:05:42 +0000 http://mandhro.com/2007/01/11/edgy-on-rails-get-compiling/#comment-641 rubdabadub, If you are using Apache 2.2, then you can do without Pound. In my opinion, Apache's mod_proxy_balancer works great. The only configuration where I used Pound was with Mongrels behind LightTPD. - Zak rubdabadub,

If you are using Apache 2.2, then you can do without Pound. In my opinion, Apache’s mod_proxy_balancer works great. The only configuration where I used Pound was with Mongrels behind LightTPD.

- Zak

]]> By: rubdabadub http://mandhro.com/2007/01/11/edgy-on-rails-get-compiling/comment-page-1/#comment-631 rubdabadub Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:10:13 +0000 http://mandhro.com/2007/01/11/edgy-on-rails-get-compiling/#comment-631 Hi: Thanks for the post! I needed apache 2.2 like you /usr/local suits me better. One question I have is.. Do I really need Pound? I thought mod_proxy did the load balancing.. well as you can see i have not tried it before .. i am thinking merely from this post.. http://blog.codahale.com/2006/06/19/time-for-a-grown-up-server-rails-mongrel-apache-capistrano-and-you/ Thanks for your feedback! Hi:

Thanks for the post! I needed apache 2.2 like you /usr/local suits me better. One question I have is..

Do I really need Pound? I thought mod_proxy did the load balancing.. well as you can see i have not tried it before .. i am thinking merely from this post..

http://blog.codahale.com/2006/06/19/time-for-a-grown-up-server-rails-mongrel-apache-capistrano-and-you/

Thanks for your feedback!

]]>